A very clear example representing this issue was in a movie called Tomb Raider. In the reading, Ziesler mentions how there are very few action movies with the girl as the lead role. For the most part this is true, but there are still a handful of action movies where a female does earn the lead part. When analyzing Angelina Jolie’s role in Tomb Raider, it is not hard to realize that her character is deeply affected by this objectification of women. In the movie, there is hardly a single scene where she is not wearing tight, skimpy clothing. Her general appearance and attitude is obviously appealing to the male standard. In order to attract more men, and therefore many more viewers, Jolie is thrown into this role which is very misguiding and debatable. Her part in the movie, though, is surprisingly legitimate in my opinion. Throughout the story, she is consistently winning fights and whatnot (as most heroes do) and the fact she is a girl never really slows her down. Although she does a great job at playing the part and making a successful movie, it is apparent how the "male gaze" still had its affect.
Above is the movie poster for the film. As you can see, Jolie is wearing a very tight shirt paired with noticeably short shorts as well. It is truly a shame that one of the most seen advertisements for this film is just flaunting Jolie’s body. Especially after seeing the movie, one would have to admit that there are a decent amount of action scenes that surely could have made another trailer poster just as easily. That is, though, where the problem lies. Men will be that much more attracted to the idea of seeing the movie after seeing that poster. It is crazy what that simple change can do to help sales for the film. Honestly, that can make sense in only one way, from the advertising standpoint. Whether or not this movie were to flaunt Jolie’s body, that poster leads all that see it to believe the movie will contain a lot of emphasis on Jolie’s hot look. Unfortunately, this is the advertising angle movie producers use in hopes of raising popularity of the movie.
The idea that a lead role in an action movie should not be a woman is completely twisted. Women deserve every right to try for the part. As a head representative stated, though, movies with women as lead roles make less money. This is very important because the film industry is just that-an industry. In order for a movie to be worth filming, there must be some assurance that the movie will actually make money so that there is a profit. I guess to solve this case, they could simply pay the lead role less money than a man would normally earn, to balance out the loss of money. Of course, then, the argument that women aren’t getting paid as much as men would surely be brought up and would ignite yet another debate. Regardless, women should obviously have a fair shot at trying for action movies assuming they fit the role.
This blog does attract my attention. The big picture on the top draws the reader in. I think it is good placement for the picture. The blog also has a unique main idea. This main idea is of women in action movies and how they are portrayed. You make this idea unique, however, by tying in the business aspect and that movies need to make money.
ReplyDeleteThe main idea is that in the movie Tomb Raider, Angelina Jolie is portrayed through the male gaze by wearing tight clothing. To lengthen your blog, you could probably explain male gaze and how she is an item of it. The examples are specific and supported. I think also adding another picture in the middle of the blog would help. Maybe you could find one of her in action and in a tight outfit. This would support your main idea with visual arguments.
Matt has four paragraphs that all have a main idea and tie into the true main idea. I think it is well organized.
The blog's language is appropriate for Matt's peers. I'm not sure as to how to improve the language, I thought it was fine.
To make the blog more visually appealing you could add another picture in the middle of the blog. Also, you could change it so it is all one font. I like the font in your last paragraph for your topic because it seems to go with the action theme.
As Alannah mentioned above, the picture in front of whole text does attract the viewer's attention. However, the placement of the picture, to me, seems a bit weird. Because usually picture is used to support the ideas that come up on the next paragraph. The first paragraph that follows up after the picture talks about the definition of pop culture in contrary rather than about Angelina Jolie and her skimpy clothing, the main idea. This blog contains four paragraphs and each paragraph does relate to the main idea. The language use is appropriate and well aimed to the viewers of our age. Overall, I think this blog is very well written.
ReplyDelete